Introduction
On 27th February 2024, the DfE published further information about the National Wraparound Childcare Programme’s funding methodology. This information outlines how funding has been split across two streams, each playing a crucial role in the facilitation of the scheme and the delivery of wraparound childcare.
Funding Stream 1: Local Authority Capacity Funding (£25m)
Local Authorities in England have been allocated ‘Capacity Funding’ of £25 million over two years to facilitate the programme. This investment aims to enhance the internal capacity of LAs to deliver programme objectives effectively; for example, by funding the recruitment of designated staff member(s) to manage the programme locally.
Funding Stream 2: Programme Funding (£253 million)
Operating on-site wraparound care provides a unique opportunity for schools to offer more flexible working hours for staff. This flexibility can be particularly appealing to teachers and TAs, allowing them to better balance their professional and personal lives. It allows schools/MATs to recruit more effectively and fosters a positive working environment, promoting staff well-being and satisfaction.
Maintaining quality control
The bulk of the funding lies in the £253 million allocated to ‘Programme Funding’. This substantial amount is dedicated to accomplishing the programme’s primary objective of fostering the creation and expansion of wraparound care provision.
Local Authorities in England have already been allocated their share of this Programme Funding by the DfE. Amounts allocated to each LA are outlined, in full, in our table below.
What should potential applicants consider about the allocation methodology?
Any schools or MATs hoping to access funding via the National Wraparound Childcare Programme should consider the DfE’s intentions when allocating funding to LAs; alongside recognising the primary aims of the scheme.
The DfE’s published methodology explains that each LA’s specific funding amount was determined by school census data filed in January 2023. Consideration was given to the number of schools not already (or only partially) offering wraparound childcare; in recognition of the costs associated with creating this supply (with specific reference to staffing, food and suitable SEND provision).
When and how will the funding be given out?
Schools or MATs hoping to access funding should do so via their relevant Local Authority. It is likely that the application process will differ between LAs, with any detailed information about this unavailable at the time of writing.
We do know that the distribution of Programme Funding will be based on a ‘tapering schedule’, with a focus on providing more substantial support to wraparound care provision in its early stages. The DfE’s intention is that – as attendance increases – the fees charged for the wraparound care will gradually replace the initial programme funding (as the provision becomes self-sustaining).
The full tapering schedule for Programme Funding is shown below. A 0% taper implies that provision can be fully funded, with a 5% taper denoting a 95% funding level, and so on.
| Q1 (Apr-Jun) | Q2 (Jul-Sep) | Q3 (Oct-Dec) | Q4 (Jan-Mar) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2024-2025 | N/A | 0% | 0% | 5% |
| FY 2025-2026 | 30% | 60% | 90% | 90% |
How much funding is available in each Local Authority area?
A full breakdown of the funding allocated to each local authority in England is provided below.
| Local authority | Total allocated | Rank |
|
Barking and Dagenham |
£846,169.34 |
111 |
|
Barnet |
£1,295,508.99 |
76 |
|
Barnsley |
£1,585,464.60 |
58 |
|
Bath and North East Somerset |
£992,919.42 |
98 |
|
Bedford |
£621,931.73 |
126 |
|
Bexley |
£716,747.72 |
117 |
|
Birmingham |
£7,438,663.05 |
1 |
|
Blackburn with Darwen |
£1,400,351.97 |
66 |
|
Blackpool |
£608,712.66 |
127 |
|
Bolton |
£1,795,847.63 |
51 |
|
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole |
£934,133.14 |
101 |
|
Bracknell Forest |
£227,115.95 |
151 |
|
Bradford |
£3,197,543.54 |
22 |
|
Brent |
£862,698.76 |
107 |
|
Brighton and Hove |
£828,379.39 |
112 |
|
Bristol, City of |
£1,822,744.15 |
48 |
|
Bromley |
£512,480.14 |
136 |
|
Buckinghamshire |
£2,163,605.56 |
40 |
|
Bury |
£1,038,705.70 |
92 |
|
Calderdale |
£1,089,234.11 |
87 |
|
Cambridgeshire |
£2,871,287.66 |
28 |
|
Camden |
£1,019,832.80 |
95 |
|
Central Bedfordshire |
£1,576,036.11 |
59 |
|
Cheshire East |
£875,914.57 |
106 |
|
Cheshire West and Chester |
£1,356,714.85 |
72 |
|
Cornwall |
£3,681,642.61 |
19 |
|
County Durham |
£4,388,935.14 |
13 |
|
Coventry |
£1,537,493.44 |
61 |
|
Croydon |
£1,030,106.57 |
93 |
|
Cumberland |
£2,711,992.44 |
30 |
|
Darlington |
£541,069.39 |
132 |
|
Derby |
£1,381,952.37 |
69 |
|
Derbyshire |
£7,146,950.64 |
3 |
|
Devon |
£5,591,267.28 |
8 |
|
Doncaster |
£2,167,597.03 |
39 |
|
Dorset |
£2,471,252.35 |
34 |
|
Dudley |
£1,242,327.00 |
81 |
|
Ealing |
£1,028,216.19 |
94 |
|
East Riding of Yorkshire |
£2,025,018.54 |
42 |
|
East Sussex |
£2,680,248.65 |
31 |
|
Enfield |
£1,251,684.38 |
79 |
|
Essex |
£6,939,115.35 |
4 |
|
Gateshead |
£1,379,547.86 |
70 |
|
Gloucestershire |
£4,266,300.33 |
15 |
|
Greenwich |
£532,943.60 |
135 |
|
Hackney |
£913,638.59 |
104 |
|
Halton |
£1,486,732.66 |
62 |
|
Hammersmith and Fulham |
£539,714.38 |
133 |
|
Hampshire |
£5,888,811.79 |
7 |
|
Haringey |
£599,968.36 |
128 |
|
Harrow |
£464,643.92 |
139 |
|
Hartlepool |
£596,617.13 |
130 |
|
Havering |
£510,831.91 |
137 |
|
Herefordshire, County of |
£1,392,211.77 |
67 |
|
Hertfordshire |
£4,875,653.04 |
10 |
|
Hillingdon |
£1,069,868.54 |
88 |
|
Hounslow |
£1,134,905.72 |
84 |
|
Isle of Wight |
£638,626.96 |
124 |
|
Isles Of Scilly |
£31,074.28 |
152 |
|
Islington |
£636,949.53 |
125 |
|
Kensington and Chelsea |
£396,043.82 |
143 |
|
Kent |
£6,049,138.03 |
6 |
|
Kingston upon Hull, City of |
£1,732,498.43 |
53 |
|
Kingston upon Thames |
£236,481.21 |
150 |
|
Kirklees |
£3,115,839.13 |
23 |
|
Knowsley |
£1,069,226.55 |
89 |
|
Lambeth |
£918,467.75 |
103 |
|
Lancashire |
£6,213,603.59 |
5 |
|
Leeds |
£3,386,650.89 |
20 |
|
Leicester |
£1,902,430.03 |
46 |
|
Leicestershire |
£3,054,945.83 |
26 |
|
Lewisham |
£965,540.58 |
99 |
|
Lincolnshire |
£5,483,275.79 |
9 |
|
Liverpool |
£2,567,109.95 |
33 |
|
Luton |
£760,563.79 |
114 |
|
Manchester |
£3,027,729.97 |
27 |
|
Medway |
£1,436,841.05 |
63 |
|
Merton |
£382,477.28 |
145 |
|
Middlesbrough |
£857,470.77 |
108 |
|
Milton Keynes |
£1,430,800.78 |
64 |
|
Newcastle upon Tyne |
£1,372,760.44 |
71 |
|
Newham |
£1,119,559.05 |
85 |
|
Norfolk |
£7,420,906.69 |
2 |
|
North East Lincolnshire |
£1,055,568.55 |
91 |
|
North Lincolnshire |
£1,354,671.91 |
73 |
|
North Northamptonshire |
£1,821,402.34 |
49 |
|
North Somerset |
£598,929.84 |
129 |
|
North Tyneside |
£1,001,594.27 |
97 |
|
North Yorkshire |
£4,328,414.86 |
14 |
|
Northumberland |
£3,108,231.10 |
25 |
|
Nottingham |
£1,778,220.13 |
52 |
|
Nottinghamshire |
£3,990,920.18 |
16 |
|
Oldham |
£1,988,157.50 |
43 |
|
Oxfordshire |
£3,114,473.44 |
24 |
|
Peterborough |
£926,057.18 |
102 |
|
Plymouth |
£935,102.62 |
100 |
|
Portsmouth |
£658,260.60 |
123 |
|
Reading |
£532,972.79 |
134 |
|
Redbridge |
£804,201.41 |
113 |
|
Redcar and Cleveland |
£1,003,346.95 |
96 |
|
Richmond upon Thames |
£302,930.11 |
147 |
|
Rochdale |
£1,223,108.47 |
82 |
|
Rotherham |
£2,375,344.23 |
35 |
|
Rutland |
£269,767.27 |
148 |
|
Salford |
£1,606,979.24 |
57 |
|
Sandwell |
£1,384,495.83 |
68 |
|
Sefton |
£1,261,867.70 |
78 |
|
Sheffield |
£2,678,425.19 |
32 |
|
Shropshire |
£1,846,554.63 |
47 |
|
Slough |
£486,167.19 |
138 |
|
Solihull |
£251,695.48 |
149 |
|
Somerset |
£3,266,048.80 |
21 |
|
South Gloucestershire |
£1,248,067.67 |
80 |
|
South Tyneside |
£1,294,896.55 |
77 |
|
Southampton |
£1,180,550.76 |
83 |
|
Southend-on-Sea |
£410,124.87 |
142 |
|
Southwark |
£1,115,854.00 |
86 |
|
St. Helens |
£850,136.07 |
110 |
|
Staffordshire |
£3,718,329.08 |
18 |
|
Stockport |
£853,497.81 |
109 |
|
Stockton-on-Tees |
£1,418,495.79 |
65 |
|
Stoke-on-Trent |
£1,343,094.70 |
74 |
|
Suffolk |
£4,457,795.44 |
12 |
|
Sunderland |
£1,654,862.86 |
55 |
|
Surrey |
£2,248,019.17 |
38 |
|
Sutton |
£439,295.65 |
140 |
|
Swindon |
£1,064,665.98 |
90 |
|
Tameside |
£1,949,243.01 |
44 |
|
Telford and Wrekin |
£895,449.04 |
105 |
|
Thurrock |
£713,554.49 |
118 |
|
Torbay |
£431,209.26 |
141 |
|
Tower Hamlets |
£1,564,694.32 |
60 |
|
Trafford |
£685,371.99 |
120 |
|
Wakefield |
£2,257,646.17 |
37 |
|
Walsall |
£1,699,316.00 |
54 |
|
Waltham Forest |
£388,791.28 |
144 |
|
Wandsworth |
£684,561.61 |
121 |
|
Warrington |
£718,825.32 |
116 |
|
Warwickshire |
£2,314,366.01 |
36 |
|
West Berkshire |
£733,365.15 |
115 |
|
West Northamptonshire |
£2,128,276.72 |
41 |
|
West Sussex |
£4,872,942.36 |
11 |
|
Westminster |
£706,764.34 |
119 |
|
Westmorland and Furness |
£1,915,622.69 |
45 |
|
Wigan |
£1,796,681.22 |
50 |
|
Wiltshire |
£3,757,285.09 |
17 |
|
Windsor and Maidenhead |
£665,772.91 |
122 |
|
Wirral |
£1,616,268.25 |
56 |
|
Wokingham |
£349,365.89 |
146 |
|
Wolverhampton |
£1,319,730.01 |
75 |
|
Worcestershire |
£2,728,733.52 |
29 |
|
York |
£579,287.21 |
131 |
|
Total |
£274,079,734.75 |
(out of 152) |
What steps should schools and MATs take now?
If you work at a school or MAT that is currently considering the National Wraparound Childcare Programme, or if you have already decided to apply for funding, please do get in touch with us to understand how Childcare Bookings for Schools can support your plans.
Our service allows schools and MATs to outsource all of the booking, payment and financial admin associated with wraparound childcare – for free – meaning the community’s needs are met without any negative impact on the school office or budget. Our industry expertise and suite of template resources means we are well equipped to support both new and established provisions.
Ready to help you
This advice is just the tip of the iceberg. We have helped countless schools think through in-house care. Most have gone on to do so, but for some, it’s not the right time for them, and that’s fine. Either way, we would be delighted to help you think it through and share much more strategic and practical support to make the process of in-housing care painless and straightforward.
If you’re considering this, and you’d like an initial chat, why not get in touch?
About the Author
Dan McCaffrey is the Managing Director of Childcare Bookings for Schools. A former primary teacher and previous owner of Pioneer Childcare (the UK's 5th largest wraparound provider), he shares practical insights learned (the hard way!) from the front lines of school-run childcare.
You May Also Like
Overcoming Staffing Fears When In-Housing Childcare
It’s fascinating to see the number of schools who, despite ever tightening budgets, continue to...
How to make Bad debt a thing of the past
Despite bad debt being a common problem in many school-run childcare settings, the scale of the...
Setting prices for school run breakfast & afterschool childcare
Setting your prices can be a tricky task. Clearly you need to cover your costs and support your...


